<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good vs. Evil: Abstraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:54:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abstraction &#187; Manuel Klimek &#34; Blog Archive &#34; Good vs. Evil: Abstraction</title>
		<link>http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/comment-page-1/#comment-24327</link>
		<dc:creator>Abstraction &#187; Manuel Klimek &#34; Blog Archive &#34; Good vs. Evil: Abstraction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/#comment-24327</guid>
		<description>[...] Manuel Klimek &quot; Blog Archive &quot; Good vs. Evil: Abstraction Â bookmarkÂ thisÂ onÂ del.icio.us - posted by thesuffixed to development projectmanagement and savedÂ byÂ  people&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Manuel Klimek &quot; Blog Archive &quot; Good vs. Evil: Abstraction Â bookmarkÂ thisÂ onÂ del.icio.us &#8211; posted by thesuffixed to development projectmanagement and savedÂ byÂ  people&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: codedancer</title>
		<link>http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>codedancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/#comment-988</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Testability, encapsulation and testable OO sources...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Testability, encapsulation and testable OO sources&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristian Dupont</title>
		<link>http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristian Dupont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klimek.box4.net/blog/2007/03/18/good-vs-evil-abstraction/#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Nice post. I agree with you - good abstractions are actually quite challenging to come up with. People rely on metaphors which may work fine but then when another layer of abstraction is required, they add adjectives to the names which is never really very aesthetic nor easy to work with. I think that my personal guideline is to never introduce them before I observe duplicated code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. I agree with you &#8211; good abstractions are actually quite challenging to come up with. People rely on metaphors which may work fine but then when another layer of abstraction is required, they add adjectives to the names which is never really very aesthetic nor easy to work with. I think that my personal guideline is to never introduce them before I observe duplicated code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
